HAARP continues to occupy a significant amount of our attention and has remained the
focus of much of our current work. We have had the opportunity to speak out about this
project in numerous radio and television programs. In addition, a number of news articles
have begun to be published throughout the country on this very important subject. We are
thankful to all of the media people which have granted us time to bring our work out in
front of the citizenry. The issue has not slowed down in terms of general interest in the
topic. The story has served as a catalyst for involvement in political and governmental
affairs for many individuals.
We have received a number of articles and news clippings from across the country which
has provided a good deal of material for use in this publication. One of the most
interesting pieces of information arrived just after the book was published.
An article, "Behind the Russian SDI Offer: A Scientific, Technological, and
Strategic Revolution", appeared in the magazine 21st Century in the summer of 1993.
The article was based on a front page story appearing in a Soviet government newspaper,
Izvestia, on April 2, 1993. The article disclosed a whole new area of science and invited
the United States to participate in the joint development of this new technology in a
"Star Wars" weapons program. The initiative indicated that the Russians were far
ahead in many of the areas important to the development of this "Star Wars"
technology. One of the key components of the Russian technology was their greater
understanding of "nonlinear" processes involved in the generation, propagation
and absorption of powerful pulses of electro-magnetic radiations.
What are "nonlinear" processes? This relates to the idea of a small input of
additional energy creating a disproportionally larger output of energy. A research
scientist, Al Zielinski, recently sent us the following example of nonlinear effects:
Experiment #1
Imagine we had an unlimited amount of dominoes and we lined them up from here to, let's
say, Paris. Then we could tip the first domino with 10 grams; it will fall down and cause
the second domino to tumble, too, etc. The first action of 10 grams will cause all the
dominoes to tumble including the last domino in Paris.
From this experiment we should understand that it is not the 10 gram action that causes
all the dominoes to tumble, but the 10 gram action just creates an imbalance of the first
domino. It is the gravity, however, that causes the dominoes to fall. In other words: only
a 10 gram action is required to trigger a gravitational activity of all our dominoes from
here to Paris.
Experiment #2
Imagine we had an unlimited amount of special dominoes of which only the first one we
line up here is of normal size, and all the subsequent dominoes we line up again from here
to Paris are of continuously increased size. By the time we reached Paris, the last domino
block would be 1000 meters high and weigh millions of tons. Again we tip the first domino
here with 10 grams, which will fall down causing all the subsequent dominoes to tumble. By
the time the gravitational action reaches Paris, the last domino in Paris will smash the
Eiffel Tower.
From this experiment we should understand that it is not the 10 gram action here that
will smash the Eiffel Tower in Paris, but it is the gravitational energy that is picked up
on the way to Paris that smashes the Eiffel Tower.
In other words: only a 10 gram action is required to trigger a non-linear gravitational
activity which will cause the destruction of the Eiffel Tower.
With the above examples in mind imagine the nonlinear effects of 1 billion watts of
effective radiated power being directed at the ionosphere by the HAARP transmitter. This
is the first phase capability of the project. The second phase will increase the effective
radiated power levels even further -- to 4.7 billion watts! In our book we point out that
energy in certain frequencies when reaching the outermost portions of the ionosphere can
be amplified up to 1000 times by natural processes. This phenomena has been recorded by
scientists at UCLA who have observed the results of these power amplifications at a
fraction of the power level which HAARP will transfer to this region. This is extremely
important in considering what may occur with this level of energy. A serious environmental
disaster may well be the result.

The earlier referenced article from 21st Century magazine goes on to describe the
implications of the use of phased array antennas and their potentials at 1 billion watt
power levels. This is the antena array HAARP uses and the level of power it is designed to
broadcast. What the article describes is a system which can be used for knocking down
missiles and aircraft by effecting their guidance systems and creating atmospheric
disturbances which lead to them crashing. They also talk about the ability, at lower power
levels, to be able to look down from the ionosphere and detect cruise missiles and other
incoming objects utilizing what was described as an advanced form of radar. Again this is
exactly what has been described in the HAARP patents.
Plasma is a term for an electrically conductive state of matter generated from a gas.
It can be created by action of extreme heat, powerful electromagnetic fields and by high
levels of focused radio frequency energy such as the energy created with the HAARP
instrument. 21st Century magazine suggests that, "The term plasmoid refers to the
fact that under certain conditions a plasma can develop a self-contained, self-stabilizing
structure based on the magnetic and other effects of internal configurations of electric
currents within the plasma." This particular concept is important when referring to
the concept of "painting the ionosphere" which was described by the military in
the HAARP documents. This is in fact what the military will do with HAARP for certain
applications. These plasmas are much different than those described in fusion research in
that they involve very low electron energies. What is known is that although they are
"cool" by comparison to fusion plasmas they are remarkably long lived and strong
when generated in certain gases. Those specific gases include nitrogen and oxygen, the
major components of the earth's atmosphere!
So what does all of this translate into? According to the article it is suggested that
this technology can be used for modifying the ionosphere over very large areas for
"over-the-horizons" telecommunications disruption, creating computer errors and
perhaps even creating negative biological effects. What is known from other government
documents, HAARP planning documents and International Red Cross documents is that all of
this is possible with these new systems. What is also known now is that a single complex
system can combine radar tracking with a speed-of-light means of destruction - the
plasmoid. This is but one application of HAARP. The writers of the 21st Century article
were not acquainted with the patents regarding HAARP or they would have recognized that
the United States military was not interested in the Russian overture of cooperation
because we already possessed the means to produce these effects. What also rings
throughout the article brings us back to where we began our research into the HAARP system
two years ago - to the ideas of Nikola Tesla. A New York Times article of December 8, 1915
says:
"Nikola Tesla, the inventor, has filed patent applications on the essential parts
of a machine, possibilities which test a layman's imagination and promise a parallel of
Thor's shooting thunderbolts from the sky to punish those who had angered the
gods...Suffice it to say that the invention will go through space with a speed of 300
miles a second, a manless ship without propelling engine or wings sent by electricity to
any desired point on the globe on its errand of destruction, if destruction its
manipulator wishes to effect."
'It is not a time,' said Dr. Tesla yesterday, 'to go into the details of this thing. It
is founded upon a principle that means great things in peace; it can be used for great
things in war. But I repeat, this is no time to talk of such things.'
'It is perfectly practicable to transmit electrical energy without wires and produce
destructive effects at a distance. I have already constructed a wireless transmitter which
makes this possible, and have described it in my technical publications, among which I
refer to my patent number 1,119,732 recently granted. With transmitters of this kind we
are enabled to project electrical energy in any amount to any distance and apply it for
innumerable purposes, both in war and peace. Through the universal adoption of this
system, ideal conditions for the maintenance of law and order will be realized, for then
the energy necessary to the enforcement of right and justice will be normally productive,
yet potential, and in any moment available, for attack and defense. The power transmitted
need not be necessarily destructive, for, if distance is made to depend upon it, its
withdrawal or supply will bring about the same results as those now accomplished by force
of arms.'
A second article also appeared in the New York Times, on September 22, 1940 and read:
"Nikola Tesla, one of the truly great inventors, who celebrated his eighty-fourth
birthday on July 10, tells the writer that he stands ready to divulge to the United States
government the secret of his 'teleforce', with which, he said, airplane motors would be
melted at a distance of 250 miles, so that an invisible Chinese Wall of Defense would be
built around the country..."
"This 'teleforce', he said, is based upon an entirely new principle of physics
that 'no one has ever dreamed about', different from the principle embodied in his
inventions relating to the transmission of electrical power from a distance, for which he
has received a number of basic patents. This new type of force, Mr. Tesla said, would
operate through a beam one one hundred-millionth of a square centimeter in diameter, and
could be generated from a special plant that would cost no more than $2,000,000 and would
take only about three months to construct."
"The beam, he states, involves four new inventions, two of which already have been
tested. One of these is a method and apparatus for producing rays 'and other
manifestations of energy' in free air, eliminating the necessity for a high vacuum; a
second is a method and process for producing 'very great electrical force'; the third is a
method for amplifying this force and the fourth is a new method for producing 'a
tremendous electrical repelling force'. This would be the projector, or gun, of the
system. The voltage for propelling the beam to its objective, according to the inventor,
will attain a potential of 50,000,000 volts."
"With this enormous voltage, he said, microscopic electrical particles of matter
will be catapulted on their mission of defensive destruction. He has been working on this
invention, he added, for many years and has recently made a number of improvements in
it."
As the ideas reverberate through my mind I cannot help but to feel that we again are
walking down a darkened road of destruction. We are again on a path which may in fact lead
to greater problems than those we seek to solve by tampering with the ionosphere.
In March 1996 the military begins to demonstrate the earth-penetrating-tomography
applications of this technology --the idea of "x-raying" the earth with ELF
waves generated by HAARP. These waves will pass through every living thing in the path and
may have perceptible effects on people's health. This demonstration of this capability is
critical for the military to gain the additional funding for the second phase of their
project. That phase was originally estimated at $175 million dollars and will give the
military power levels of 4.7 billion watts of effective radiated power.
Politically, things are only beginning to move as the opposition to this project
continues to grow. Researchers, independent scientists and most importantly lay people all
over the world are beginning to let their ideas be felt on this very important issue.
Elsewhere in this microbook is an essay on creating political realities. We ask all of our
readers to consider taking a step for change and activating some of the ideas contained in
that essay.